FSS are the creators or AGPL3, aka. The liscence OnlyOffice is released under.
FSS made a statement/blog-post to come out and say the restrictions OnlyOffice added is illegitimate and not in accordance with AGPL3.
OO isn’t just asking for attribution they are asking two things.
- You must keep out logo
- Nobody is allowed to use our logo
Do you see the problem, it’s not just attribution
freeman@sh.itjust.works 2 weeks ago
Attribution is required by the (A)GPL and is standard in forks. What is not required is preserving branding and logos.
For a good reason, those are often trademarks. Had they included them Only office would sue them for trademark violations.
It’s a dishonest attempt to override the FOSS license.