I am seeing that the term “boycott” means vastly different things to historians and the average emptor.
When I say «boycott,» what is the first that comes to your mind?
For me, it’s this.
A rioting mob of Luddites, British workers who were opposed to increasing mechanization of jobs.🔗
DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 month ago
Boycotts are by definition non-violent. You can’t just use an outdated definition or make up your own if you want people to understand what you’re trying to communicate. Just say riot, uprising or revolt instead.
rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 month ago
DdCno1@beehaw.org 1 month ago
Are you this abrasive in the real world as well or just online?
rursta@retrolemmy.com 1 month ago
I’m sorry, did Samsung pay you lip service for them, or do believe corporations are friends?
😌