Comment on Lidarr not finding release / group that exists in MusicBrains?

non_burglar@lemmy.world ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

• TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m actually generally finding it working better for me since they let you search for releases/groups and not just artists.

  source
• mondoman712@lemmy.ml ⁨9⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  I’m using Lidarr and it’s sometimes a bit of a hassle but it works. What would you recommend instead?

  source

  • HumbleBragger@piefed.social ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I use tubifarry, a lidarr plugin to use slskd (soulseek) to find and download albums. For me is way better than searching for torrents

    source
  • non_burglar@lemmy.world ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    I don’t think there is anything, really.

    Radarr and Sonarr work because the naming conventions for videos are more or less established.

    With music, everyone has a different philosophy for tagging, renaming files, transcoding, how to handle best-of albums, compilations, etc. So what works for you probably doesn’t work for me and vice versa.

    Lidarr gets very few updates, I don’t think anyone is working on it anymore. I remember the problem was keeping up with metadata handling.

    source

    • ergonomic_importer@piefed.ca ⁨8⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Lidarr gets very few updates, I don’t think anyone is working on it anymore

      I don’t know where you’re getting this from, the latest docker image was released 3 days ago

      https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-lidarr/releases/tag/3.1.0.4875-ls43

      source

      • non_burglar@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

        Uhh… That’s a repackage of Lidarr in docker, and based on the commits only to comments and to the packager’s Discord server, I would say they probably aren’t adding any actual functional changes.

        This is the actual Lidarr repo: github.com/Lidarr/Lidarr

        source