Comment on THE DAY HATH COME
orrk@lemmy.world 11 months agobecause Confucius isn’t as good a person (or ideology) as people seem to think, unless you are the current ruler, then it’s amazing
Comment on THE DAY HATH COME
orrk@lemmy.world 11 months agobecause Confucius isn’t as good a person (or ideology) as people seem to think, unless you are the current ruler, then it’s amazing
andros_rex@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Have you read any of Confucius writings? Rulers actually have higher expectations for them than common folk. If a ruler doesn’t act properly and conduct the proper rituals, then their people can’t be expected either. I’m not sure how familiar you are with Confucian thought, I’m struggling to understand what you are basing that statement on.
pomodoro_longbreak@sh.itjust.works 11 months ago
I have no real context other than what is here, and maybe Frogfucius, and I’m not great at reading between the lines so bear with me, because that doesn’t seem so awful for medieval philosophy. Lead by virtue rather than punishment? Sounds almost enlightened.
I mean with the part about rules and propriety, it sound a bit like the Broken Window Theorem which has been shown to be a cover for racist policing, but it also came out in the 80s.
Anyway, I’m not Staning Confucius
andros_rex@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Not medieval, Confucius was writing in 500 BCE. I’m not staning Confucius, but he was far harsher on rulers than he was peasants. Rulers are supposed to act like rulers, if they want their people to follow. There are more restrictions on them - a bad ruler can cause droughts or other disasters.
orrk@lemmy.world 11 months ago
and the joke is, who sets these traditions and rules? go a bit farther, and you learn the justification of these rules is “there wasn’t a natural disaster recently”
like sure there are stringent rules the leader must follow, but whatever the leader decides the rules should be is what even these rules are