It certainly could be, especially if you’re not doing anything wrong. But if a government pries that much, you’d maybe be painting a target on your back by inventing a new language. You could also use an existing language that is hard to translate and learn, and isn’t well known. Like Ithkuil
Comment on [deleted]
AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.world 1 year agoWouldn’t the cost be too high to them? I understand if it is a widely used language but at some point the cost-benefit calculation just isn’t there, right?
GhostsAreShitty@lemmy.world 1 year ago
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 1 year ago
If you’re a “person of interest”, the government is happy to spend the last taxpayer dime to find out what you are up to.
AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Just who is likely to end up a person of interest? actual enemies of society or people who through their speech/thought threaten the governments power? So is it bin laden or occupy?
TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 1 year ago
In general, felony charges not misdemeanors. For example
local12.com/…/ohio-teacher-found-murdered-outside…
valleycentral.com/…/mcallen-pd-search-for-person-…
pressherald.com/…/wilton-police-have-a-person-of-…
AnarchistsForDemocracy@lemmy.world 1 year ago
What about occupy that had the eff be I subvert them in a covert manner. Or the famous cointelpro program that lead to the murder of numerous black civil rights activists. or the contemporary black identity extremist designation created by low and fortes men to go after black lives matter.
these instances prove that no matter the country/nation these measures are used against legal dissent.