Comment on PlayStation To Delete A Ton Of TV Shows Users Already Paid For
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 years agoYou own a limited access license. It’s not a hard concept to understand.
Comment on PlayStation To Delete A Ton Of TV Shows Users Already Paid For
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 years agoYou own a limited access license. It’s not a hard concept to understand.
netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
(Media) corporations want to screw you over and extract as much money as possible out of you, it’s not a hard concept to understand.
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 years ago
I agree. What you’re saying doesn’t contradict me at all.
netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 years ago
The arguments you provided earlier are the exact same arguments a media corporation would make. I know that technically you own a restrictive af license to watch the content, but in reality, it’s pretty hard to call this ownership. Corporations hate the concept of people owning stuff. If they can sell this restrictive garbage as ownership, they can set a new standard and use it to further destroy ownership of media. The saddest part is that it works. Best Buy already plans to stop selling Blu Rays. This is the beginning of the destruction of freedom and media ownership. We really shouldn’t be arguing over this minor BS, instead, we should all agree that piracy is absolutely justified when media corporations keep getting greedier and greedier.
PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 2 years ago
Description isn’t advocacy. I’m not “making an argument” because there’s no argument to be made. It’s a fact that Sony only sells limited access licenses on the Playstation Store. Yeah, we can both agree that it’s BS and pirating is better, etc., but putting out misinformation that people ever owned that media to begin with accomplishes nothing.