Uh there is a massive difference in quality on a disc vs streamed. Compression happens whether you have fast or slow internet.
In the video I always notice the giant blocks of compression in sky/snow scenes, plus blacks that all merge together.
Audio you can tell it clips the highs and the lows to squeeze it into a compressed stream.
Maybe you don’t care, but once you notice it it’s impossible to not notice it
some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
tell me you dont care about video quality at all without telling me you dont care about video quality at all.
it is incredibly easy in a blind a/b test to pick put a streamed title vs a native bluray title. by video and by audio (provided you are using something that isnt your shitty built-in TV speakers). im not sure why youre confidently making this assertion that literally anyone can test at home with basic equipment.
djsoren19@yiffit.net 11 months ago
I’ll admit to arrogance on blu-ray, I have never owned a blu-ray player. My assertion was in regards to DVD, which I do still own a player for and use reasonably regularly. I don’t seriously think anyone is buying DVDs for the purpose of quality, since afaik they are still only 1080p max. At the very least, most of the DVDs that I personally own are still SD, and as such look about as good as 4k streamed with compression.
some_guy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 months ago
Titles that have never been released on bluray (but did have a DVD release) are still noticably better on disc than streamed. And that is a surprising number of older TV shows.