Well the American way is not to hold the company accountable, I.e. school shootings, so yeah.
Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges
Darkrai@kbin.social 1 year ago
It seems weird that the AI companies aren't being held responsible too.
Demigodrick@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 year ago
I’m pretty sure you can’t hold a school liable for a school shooting
stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 1 year ago
I think they were referring to the firearm manufacturer and\or dealer.
JokeDeity@lemm.ee 1 year ago
Just to be clear, you guys think that any company that produces anything that ends up used in a crime should have criminal charges for making the product? Yeah, makes about as much sense as anything these days.
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Was Kodak ever held responsible for original CSAM?
jonne@infosec.pub 1 year ago
I think stable diffusion is an open source AI you can run on your own computer, so I don’t see how the developers should be held responsible for that.
bjorney@lemmy.ca 1 year ago
It’s open source code that someone ran on their own computer, it’s not like he used paid OpenAI credits to generate the image.
It also would set a bad precedent - it would be like charging Solomons & Fryhle because someone used their (absolutely ubiquitous) organic chemistry textbook to create methamphetamine