Well the American way is not to hold the company accountable, I.e. school shootings, so yeah.
Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges
Darkrai@kbin.social 11 months ago
It seems weird that the AI companies aren't being held responsible too.
Demigodrick@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 11 months ago
I’m pretty sure you can’t hold a school liable for a school shooting
stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 11 months ago
I think they were referring to the firearm manufacturer and\or dealer.
JokeDeity@lemm.ee 11 months ago
Just to be clear, you guys think that any company that produces anything that ends up used in a crime should have criminal charges for making the product? Yeah, makes about as much sense as anything these days.
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 11 months ago
Was Kodak ever held responsible for original CSAM?
jonne@infosec.pub 11 months ago
I think stable diffusion is an open source AI you can run on your own computer, so I don’t see how the developers should be held responsible for that.
bjorney@lemmy.ca 11 months ago
It’s open source code that someone ran on their own computer, it’s not like he used paid OpenAI credits to generate the image.
It also would set a bad precedent - it would be like charging Solomons & Fryhle because someone used their (absolutely ubiquitous) organic chemistry textbook to create methamphetamine