Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 month agoWe’re discussing the underpinnings and philosophy of the legality and your comment is simply “it is illegal”
I can only draw from this that your morality is based on laws instead of vice versa.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
I’m in the camp if that there is no reason that you should have that kind of imagery especially AI generated imagery. Think about what people often do with pornography. You do not want them doing that with children regardless of if it is AI generated.
Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 1 month ago
What does want have to do with it? I’d rather trust science and psychologists to determine if this, which is objectively harmless, helps them control their feelings and gives them a harmless outlet.
possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 month ago
They aren’t banning porn in general. They just don’t want to create any more sexual desires toward children. The CSAM laws came from child protection experts. Admittedly some of these people want to “ban” encryption but that’s irrelevant in this case.