Oops you forgot to use logic. As per the comment you’re replying to, the more apt analogy would be: is an AI generated picture of a car still a picture of a car.
Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month agoNo it isn’t, not anymore than a drawing of a car is a real car, or drawings of money are reap money.
h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 month ago
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
That has nothing to do with logic? Its pointing out that both drawings and AI gens are not really the things they might depict
laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Nobody is saying they’re real, and I now see what you’re saying.
By your answers, your question is more “at-face-value” than people assume:
You are asking:
“Did violence occur in real life in order to produce this violent picture?”
The answer is, of course, no.
But people are interpreting it as:
“This is a picture of a man being stoned to death. Is this picture violent, if no violence took place in real life?”
To which answer is, yes.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
It can be abhorrent and unlikable, its still not abuse
laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 1 month ago
We’re not disagreeing.
The question was:
“Is this an abuse image if it was generated?”
Yes, it is an abuse image.
Is it actual abuse? Of course not.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
And yet its being treated as though it is
h3mlocke@lemm.ee 1 month ago
No genius it’s just promoting abuse. Have a good day.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
Just like violent video games produce school shooters
PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Material showing a child being sexually abused is child sexual abuse material.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
And an AI generated image does not show a child being abused
PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 month ago
Bullshit and you know it.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 1 month ago
There is no child being abused by a generated image or a drawing.