Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges

• laughterlaughter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  We’re not disagreeing.

  The question was:

  “Is this an abuse image if it was generated?”

  Yes, it is an abuse image.

  Is it actual abuse? Of course not.

  source

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    And yet its being treated as though it is

    source

    • laughterlaughter@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Well, that’s another story. I just answered your question. “Are these images about abuse even if they’re generated?” Yup, they are.

      “Should people be prosecuted because of them?” Welp, someone with more expertise should answer this. Not me.

      source
    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      Images of children being raped are being treated as images of children being raped. Nobody has every been caught with child pornography and charged as if they abused the children themselves. Everything is being treated as it always has been, but you’re here arguing that it’s moral and harmless as long as an AI does it, using every semantic trick and shifted goalpost you possibly can.

      source
• h3mlocke@lemm.ee ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

  No genius it’s just promoting abuse. Have a good day.

  source

  • Daxtron2@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

    Just like violent video games produce school shooters

    source

    • PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

      You’ve already fucked up your own argument. You’re supposed to be insisting there’s no such thing as a “violent video game”, because representations of violence don’t count, only violence done to actual people.

      source

      • Daxtron2@startrek.website ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago

        If you can’t follow a simple line of logic to explain a counterpoint, that’s on you.

        source

        • -> View More Comments