Comment on Portable CD players are back and now work with wireless headphones

• Laser@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

  Then again why would it need to be at 320 kbit for this kind of use case

  source

  • Juvyn00b@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

    There’s no technical reason for 320 CBR but the space loss from a VBR ~224 encode to the CBR 320 is minimal compared to 320 vs flac around 1000. I do keep two copies of my collection for space reasons though - one in flac and one at 320. My phone is still a limiting factor to from a space perspective, I can’t store my entire collection on it in flac but I do choose to use it where I’m actively listening to an album through the weeks. The rest can be mp3 because it’s usually a single song that gets in my head.

    source

    • Laser@feddit.org ⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago

      I don’t really have MP3-only use cases anymore, but back when I did, it was mostly where transparency was achieved rather easily, like listening to music on the go with… non-perfect headphones, and on those cases, I went with lame’s -V5 IIRC which is closer to 130 kbit/s or so. For higher quality, but not lossless (storage was still expensive back then) I used Musepack. But high bitrate MP3 was almost never needed.

      source