Comment on [@GamersNexus] They Changed Everything: Valve Steam Deck OLED vs. LCD Tear-Down
ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 year agoThe problem with that is lending money to a business that needs money also means you’re risking if the business fails that you’re never getting your money back. No one wants to risk their $100,000 in hopes of getting back $108,000 a year from now.
ChristianWS@lemmy.eco.br 1 year ago
Even then you can just add a higher interest rate. You absolutely don’t need to held the company hostage until the heat death of the universe.
JoshuaSlowpoke777@lemmy.world 1 year ago
Are… Are you suggesting that there are potential ways a public company system could’ve actually been handled better, rather than the concept itself being flawed by nature?
I’m not saying I disagree, I’m just saying that possibility never occurred to me for some reason. (Maybe it’s my justice sensitivity complex acting up)
ChristianWS@lemmy.eco.br 1 year ago
Yesn’t?
Like, the whole point of a public traded company is that anyone can come in and give money to the company and, in turn, they get money when the company is doing well, so the money you’ve paid is, hopefully, not lost.
I don’t know about you, but on paper, that sounds like bonds and basically every type of debt in existence.
The difference is the perpetual ownership of the company by shareholders. 20 years ago someone lend a company 20k, they now have an asset that grew immensely in value, it gives them money quarterly/yearly/whatever, AND they have decision power on the company, despite the fact that they have earned 100x what they lent.
Just changing the idea of stock to be something with an expiration date would remove most of the weirdness of the system, but at that point it isn’t really a public-traded company, is it?