Comment on The TikTok Ban Paradox: How Platform Restrictions Create What They Aim to Prevent
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 days agoI mean the VPN providers themselves (at least some) have been quite busy promoting their services. For years already. NordVPN ads run on TV, at times every other Youtube video was "sponsored by NordVPN". So people should know about their existence.
But... It would be a massive surprise to me if the average user was going to change their habits. I've been telling people constantly not to give their flashlight app access to contacts, location and full administrator privileges. Told them to pay attention to their freedom and maybe not sell their soul to big tech if there's nice and lovely mail providers which have a foot massage ready for you for $1 a month. People don't care and they won't listen. They'll ask me "Yeah, but why don't you just WhatsApp and GMail?"
I see no way this is going to change, and they'll now suddenly pick up to fight for their freedom. I think that's a niche for some few Linux nerds. I'd be very happy, though, if I was wrong and they do...
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Visiting TikTok every time you’re bored isn’t a habit?
Some of this stuff is functionally non-negotiable, at least from a practical perspective. If your OS is harvesting your data, there’s only so much you can do without completely rooting the device. If the only way to access the internet is by signing up with a satanic ISP, you’re not simply going to go without and still function in a modern economy.
But this isn’t businesses doing “Treats with Strings Attached”. This is nanny state conservatives putting up relatively easily evaded barriers to said treats in order to tell their paleocon base that the problem of pornography in their state has been solved.
I see things changing day by day. Just not in the direction I’d prefer.
But there’s always a breaking point, there’s always a backlash, and these institutions only have a reach up to the scale of human labor they’re willing to commit tot he task
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 days ago
I mean you could just install Signal instead of WhatsApp. Takes literally the same effort.
I get your point. It's valid. I still think it's not going to happen. It'll be either to complicated, or there will be other brain-rot content available someplace else. Or it's going to be the boiling frog syndrome. One tiny freedom after another will dissapear. Maybe there's still porn on xhamster available. So it's not that big a deal. And nobody will notice the subtle change. And one day it'll just be the world without porn, free speech, but with total surveillance. I really believe we can get there without any uprising if we make the steps small enough.
We'll see. As I said, I'm not overly enthusiastic. But it's speculation and I might be wrong.
UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Signal isn’t secure unless all parties are using it. That’s before you get into the company’s own questionable relationship with the Open Technology Fund.
What’s the point of total surveillance if there’s nothing to blackmail?
I’d argue we’re getting about as close as we can to total surveillance, and now we’re dealing with gluts of information that are too big to parse in a timely manner.
But a lot of this isn’t the end of porn, it’s the criminalization of porn as a means of threatening prosecution of anyone with a digital device an a hard on.
hendrik@palaver.p3x.de 3 days ago
Well, I don't think total surveillance is necessarily about blackmailing or something as direct. It's a broad way to assert and keep control. Control of everything. Force people to behave how you like, bend them to your will and to subjugate somebody.
You don't really need to blackmail them... Spreading fear uncertainty and doubt will get you a long way. And why even bother with facts to blackmail someone? You could as well make something up. If you're in total control, that's enough to make someone's life miserable.
We're not there, yet.
But it's been 10 years now since PRISM and Snowden. Even back then they were able to process a good chunk of the internet. The NSA has a massive datacenter somewhere in Utah, with god knows how many exabytes of storage. It's probably not gotten better since then. And they don't need to intercept every single packet from every device. Random sampling and collecting and processing as much stuff as they can, will do for a lot of use-cases. And every bit of knowledge, every fact they know (and process) makes them smarter and gets them ahead of the situation and in control. And naturally, that'll be an insatiable thirst for information. Of course they always want more. More processing power etc.
I think at this point it's more some ominous danger, lurking at us. Maybe they just don't like to reveal they've read and stored every single one of my e-mails. Maybe it's better for them to just keep silent.
I'm postive they can't collect everything. But it'll still be a large-scale overcollection. Because no one stopped them since 2013. And I'm not a conspiracy theorist. I'm pretty sure encryption works. And there are means of private communication. But it's really hard to avoid metadata. And using modern electronics. If you're carrying a mobile phone, they'll know your location 24/7. And that's enough to invade privacy. And I -personally- know like 2 people who don't do that.
I also don't think this is the end of porn. And I'd say it's questionable if "they" are even opposed to it. That's just the (too many) religious bigots. But they don't wield enough power to enforce a prohibition on internet porn.