Comment on The New Yorker Asks: Is the A.I. Boom Turning Into an A.I. Bubble?

• brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Not a lot? The quirk is they’ve hyper specialized nodes around AI.

  The GPU boxes are useful for some other things, but they will be massively oversupplied, and they mostly aren’t networked like supercomputer clusters.

  source

  • misk@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    That’s what I figured but was open to hearing how data centers won’t go bankrupt when current VC / investor money stops propping up AI arms race. I’m not even sure lots existing hardware won’t go to waste because there’s seemingly not enough power infrastructure to feed them and big tech corpos are building nuclear reactors (on top of restarting coal power plants…). Those reactors might be another silver lining however similar to cheap compute becoming available for scientific applications.

    source

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

      because there’s seemingly not enough power infrastructure

      This is overblown. I mean, if you estimate TSMC’s entire capacity and assume every data center GPU they make is full TDP 100% of the time (which is not true), the net consumption isn’t that high. The local power/cooling infrastructure things are more about corpo cost cutting.

      Altman’s preaching that power use will be exponential is a lie that’s already crumbling.

      But there is absolutely precedent for underused hardware flooding the used markets, or getting cheap on cloud providers. Honestly this would be incredible for the local inference community, as it would give tinkerers (like me) actually affordable access to experiment with.

      source