Large companies actually enforce people to use AI with telemetry tracking and punish for not using it. They measure efficiency of worker by amount of AI the worker use.
Comment on Data Shows That AI Use Is Now Declining at Large Companies
jaykrown@lemmy.world 3 days ago
It makes sense that large companies would be incapable of using it effectively. They rely on antiquated systems and rigid structures that are less likely to change than smaller companies.
vane@lemmy.world 3 days ago
webadict@lemmy.world 3 days ago
What a dumb take.
People don’t use AI for a lot of reasons, but it’s not because their company said they couldn’t. Every programmer I know is being asked to use AI, and most of them find AI to be significantly shitty to use on top of how horrible it is to use it from an environmental, occupational, moral, and psychological view.
Like, skip past the parts where AI has killed people. Skip past the insane water usage. Skip past the emissions. Skip past the cognitive reduction in reasoning.
This thing was trained on whatever data they could get a hold of: the internet, discredited information, and biased data notwithstanding. When you’re lucky, it is basically a coin flip on whether it works or not. So, if you have no foundation about the question you ask it, you have no clue if that is a hallucination or a bad data point or a correct answer. And if you do, you have to double check the answer anyway.
AI, as it is now, is a glorified search engine doubling as a sycophant. The main purpose of the businesses that own and run AI is to keep you using it, forever. Whether it is good or bad at anything else is unintentional.
wizblizz@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Well put, and even skipping past all the serious issues, its trash. Even without all the issues it still sucks ass. Just trying to search the internet sucks, it’s all AI nonsense with no way to filter it out.
webadict@lemmy.world 2 days ago
Right. And that problem compounds itself, as well. The more AI generated information that exists and inevitably is fed back into the algorithm, the worse the outcomes will get because algorithms will essentially inbreed themselves off the data they generate.
But these companies are desperate to hook other companies on AI. If they can generate income off of AI by renting other companies AI workers, they’ve made you a perpetual customer. The boss is asking workers to use these AI to feed more specific data into the algorithm to better mimic the workers because the more workers that use these, the more “good” data they can feed into them, to ultimately replicate your job functions.
It’s just… Bad from pretty much every angle.
jaykrown@lemmy.world 3 days ago
What a dumb take.
webadict@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Well defended. Truly, brevity.