Comment on Valve dev counters calls to scrap Steam AI disclosures, says it's a "technology relying on cultural laundering, IP infringement, and slopification"

• ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Let’s not kid ourselves that that’s the line that must not be crossed. Art, sound and code is more than one line for anyone that has written even a hello world program on any popular game engine. This is a bad faith argument with no purpose other than to muddy the waters.

  source

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    The point is, I guarantee you valve has ai generate code in their platform. It’s widely used. And unless you’ve gone and like vibe coded the whole thing it’s pointless to require declaring it.

    Where do you draw the line? A function? A class? An optimized algorithm?

    Steams policy is bad.

    source
• BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  You only need do disclose what could ever potentially be identified as AI. Otherwise it’s unenforceable. Even saying it’s used for code is debatable. You can’t tell once it’s compiled and can’t tell the difference between one developer breaking the companies policy or a policy that short snippets or auto complete are fine

  source

  • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Sounds like they should just remove it then. Having an unenforceble policy is a bad policy.

    You want them to declare that the NPCs use an LLM to interact with you sure, that’s different, but this code part of the policy is bad.

    source