Say hello to the super-speedy 27-inch UltraGear GX7.
I wonder how many people can even tell the difference between 144Hz and 480Hz apart from the extra heat and screaming GPU fans.
LG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000
Submitted 4 weeks ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
Comments
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 4 weeks ago
Valmond@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
It’s actually very simple, just activate the FPS counter and it will display the frame rate for you. (/s)
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Literally zero, but they’ll constantly tell you how amazing the difference is.
Geologist@lemmy.zip 4 weeks ago
I definitely can’t tell the difference for anything above 120hz or so, but I recall reading an article about counter strike several years ago, which showed that pro players can see an increase in performance with higher frame rates up to about 300 or 350 hz (as long as you have the fps to match it, lol).
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
At that point, was it really the rendering speed, or just the finer game engine granularity that made a difference?
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 4 weeks ago
I can’t run most games much above 100Hz with a 3090.
TastyWheat@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
I’ve got the 45" ultrawide 240hz OLED that LG make. That’s plenty fast enough.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 weeks ago
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 weeks ago
I thought it would have been obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
f2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 4 weeks ago
Number go up
crawancon@lemm.ee 4 weeks ago
presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.