Say hello to the super-speedy 27-inch UltraGear GX7.
I wonder how many people can even tell the difference between 144Hz and 480Hz apart from the extra heat and screaming GPU fans.
LG’s first 480Hz OLED gaming monitor is $1,000
Submitted 2 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
Comments
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 months ago
Valmond@lemmy.world 2 months ago
It’s actually very simple, just activate the FPS counter and it will display the frame rate for you. (/s)
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Literally zero, but they’ll constantly tell you how amazing the difference is.
Geologist@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
I definitely can’t tell the difference for anything above 120hz or so, but I recall reading an article about counter strike several years ago, which showed that pro players can see an increase in performance with higher frame rates up to about 300 or 350 hz (as long as you have the fps to match it, lol).
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
At that point, was it really the rendering speed, or just the finer game engine granularity that made a difference?
WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 2 months ago
I can’t run most games much above 100Hz with a 3090.
TastyWheat@lemmy.world 2 months ago
I’ve got the 45" ultrawide 240hz OLED that LG make. That’s plenty fast enough.
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
What’s the point if the human eye can’t see beyond 30fps?
Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
It’s okay, I understood your comment without you needing to put that stupid “/s” in
JoMiran@lemmy.ml 2 months ago
I thought it would have been obvious but the number of downvotes says otherwise.
f2sfljLhdtTZ@lemmy.world 2 months ago
That’s not entirely correct. Have you tried using a 60hz and 165hz monitor? The difference is not slight.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Number go up
crawancon@lemm.ee 2 months ago
presenting that human eye with the most up to date graphical developments provide a (however slight but still measurable) performance edge over slower refresh rates.