Will the things use LIDAR? Tesla is so far behind on self-driving tech in their cars, I think they need to finally admit their cheap camera-only method doesn’t work.
Tesla ‘Robotaxi’ trademark refused for being too generic
Submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to technology@lemmy.zip
https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/07/tesla-robotaxi-trademark-refused-for-being-too-generic/
Comments
DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 1 day ago
SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 1 day ago
Obviously you don’t understand that lidar is a waste of time and camera only if exactly what a car needs.
Musk, probably
nolefan33@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
If cars needed lidar, why did God make them without it?
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 1 day ago
“I probably know more than anyone alive about manufacturing” Literally same year “ThE CyBeR RoAdStEr WiLl Be DeLiVeReD nExT yEaR” said every year it got delayed for the last 10 years
kooks_only@lemmy.ca 1 day ago
Sorry, couldn’t read this. My eyes were just blinded by Tesla headlights.
CurlyWurlies4All@slrpnk.net 1 day ago
dr_robotBones@reddthat.com 1 day ago
Wish they would’ve done that for Figma’s ridiculous Dev Mode^tm^
XaetaCore@lemmy.xaetacore.net 1 day ago
Cybercar Cybercab Robotaxi X Space X
Do i need to go on, its like a 12 year old coming up with names. Good thing that they refuse these trademarks because it gives me vietnam flashbacks from the REACT youtube channel
Ledericas@lemm.ee 1 day ago
it looks like a repurposed cybertruck.
harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 day ago
Trademark office about to get DOGEd.
I’m surprised Musk didn’t name it “RoboTaXXXi” or something like that.
resipsaloquitur@lemm.ee 1 day ago
RoboTakkkksi.
someguy3@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Robo69taxi420.
1337robotaxi.
Roboslavewantsyouinsideher.
Mac@mander.xyz 1 day ago
He’ll come back with XxRoboTaxi42069xX most assuredly.