Open Menu
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
lotide
AllLocalCommunitiesAbout
Login

Google Not Required to Sell Chrome in Court Antitrust Ruling

⁨27⁩ ⁨likes⁩

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨misk@piefed.social⁩ to ⁨technology@lemmy.zip⁩

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-02/google-not-required-to-sell-chrome-in-court-antitrust-ruling

Archive: https://archive.ph/2025.09.02-212946/https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-02/google-not-required-to-sell-chrome-in-court-antitrust-ruling

source

Comments

Sort:hotnewtop
  • irotsoma@lemmy.blahaj.zone ⁨17⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    No surprise. The US issued any real action in antitrust cases in many decades. I think the AT&T split is really the only major one I can even remember having any real impact on improving competition. Since then lobbying and campaign contributions have skyrocketed and corporations own most of the government anyway, so there’s almost no chance of a court being able to issue a real punishment.

    source
  • MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Does this mean that Mozilla will continue to receive money from Google?

    source
    • cryptiod137@lemmy.world ⁨12⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      They ruled that they are still allowed to pay at least, so I assume it will keep going

      omgubuntu.co.uk/…/google-antitrust-ruling-firefox…

      source
    • yozul@beehaw.org ⁨23⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      That’s a separate point in the same case, but yes. The judge also ruled to allow google to keep paying for search engine placement.

      source
  • f1error@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

    Google gets to remain evil.

    source