About 5% of the total
well… ok, so does that level of abstraction give them cover on not having used any person’s/artist’s actual copyrighted material for training data? that may be a gray area for some, but i’m kinda satisfied.
Adobe Firefly used thousands of Midjourney images in training its 'ethical AI' model
Submitted 7 months ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
Comments
gregorum@lemm.ee 7 months ago
TheOneCurly@lemm.ee 7 months ago
So if I buy a load of stolen apples and bake them into pies I’m in the clear?
gregorum@lemm.ee 7 months ago
This isn’t the same thing. This is a matter of copyright infringement, not theft. Yours is the same flawed idea used by the film and music industry to claim that piracy is “theft” when it’s not.
ChowJeeBai@lemmy.world 7 months ago
The way things are going, with everyone training on everyone else’s data, we’re witnessing the death of creativity and the rise of a grey blandness.
Except when it comes to how ‘creative’ the prompt engineers are when it comes to coaxing an output of these AIs.
streetfestival@lemmy.ca 7 months ago
Your comment reminded me of how the quality of web search results has really deteriorated from say 5 years ago. Putting it all together, I wonder if we’re also witnessing the entshittification of the open internet, paving the way for the big tech companies to create paywalled platforms of more useful internet