LwL

@LwL@lemmy.world

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨It's a feature.⁩ ⁨⁨4⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago⁩:

  Which is what ML is extremely good at. Humans too, but we can’t process data quickly enough.

  I think there’d be reasonable worry about false positives though. Imagine you just have some weird playstyle (maybe due to disability) that you got really good at, so the AI classifies you as abnormal and flags you as a cheater. Much less likely when you’re looking for the software instead.

  Also it’s probably just way more expensive.

  I still think the real solution to cheaters has to be to legally go after the cheat sellers. The one time I would like for laws to protect some capitalist interests (since cheaters definitely hurt the bottom line of mp game publishers) it’s not happening.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Microsoft's decision to axe Windows 10 is driving Apple PC sales growth — users buy Macs instead of AI PCs despite Microsoft’s push for Copilot+ PCs⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨month⁩ ago⁩:

  New right click context menu for files is one example. Not sure about others bc I’ve changed just about everything I can to be like win 10, and in 10 I already changed a lot from the defaults.

• ⁨Comment⁩ on ⁨Major Windows BSOD issue takes banks, airlines, and broadcasters offline⁩ ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩:

  Are you implying they should somehow have perfect quality control? Generally the lost customer trust is enough of an incentive to not let things like this happen. Things slip through QA, and the only way to prevent that in 99.99% of cases is to invest MASSIVE amounts of money that really aren’t justified for everything. Aviation does this, because there is significant risk of death if something goes wrong, so regulations force them to. Other industries arguably should (car manufacturers…), but a random security software? No.