jwt
@jwt@programming.dev
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
It was a rhetorical question, smartass
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
This is not the argument clinic.
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
You said non-humanoid is a broad description like it’s a negative. It’s not. Fixating on making the robot humanoid unnecessarily narrows it down. Form and function are by definition not the same, so I don’t understand what you mean by that. But I’m got going to stop because it seems.you’re intentionally obtuse.
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
Yes that’s the whole point. They’re forcibly thinking in humanoid forms, while I dont care about form, I care about function. Make shit that’s useful, and I dont care what package it comes in. In the vast majority of use cases it’s incredibly cumbersome to have it in bipedal form; you to have reserve cpu power/mechanics/power for balance and shit, while not at all necessary for the tasks at hand.
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
Non-humanoids can theoretically do that too.
- Comment on A $20,000 humanoid that does chores is heading to US homes this year. 1 day ago:
Why do they keep insisting on humanoid? Just give me the crushinator to do chores for $10,000.