I mean one is literally required to play the game, the other does not.
So depending on what micro transactions are available, it seems worse to require a monthly sub then have truly optional/cosmetic mtx
I mean one is literally required to play the game, the other does not.
So depending on what micro transactions are available, it seems worse to require a monthly sub then have truly optional/cosmetic mtx
Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 5 hours ago
RuneScape can be played without a subscription.
Bluegrass_Addict@lemmy.ca 4 hours ago
if a game requires money after it’s bought, it’s not worth it… subscription or in-game stores. both are equally as bad.
I pay once… that’s it. expansions/dlc are fine because I’m not REQUIRED to get it. if the game just… stops because I didn’t get the dlc, you bet your ass I’m never buying from them again.
Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 hours ago
Exactly my feelings as well, even “time saving” MTX is insidious because it provides an incentive for the developers to slow progress to entice users to buy the mtx.
I’m mostly fine with cosmetic-only MTX but that’s because I’m able to control my impulses on buying those kinds of things the majority of the time, unfortunately I have known people who are not good at impulse control and end up spending literally thousands of dollars on bullshit cosmetics. They don’t even play the game they spent all that money on anymore.
ulu_mulu@lemmy.zip 3 hours ago
I was still playing WoW when Blizzard sold a 90$ mount on the shop, NINETY $, on top of the sub and paid xpacs.
The same day it was available, half of the playerbase got it, people are just stupid.