Privacy, no, but many states have laws in place to prevent voyeurism - app.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=9A.44.115 for example.
Meta is already facing backlash for people using these things to harass workers and women, too.
Comment on An Indian Trans Person’s Harrowing Encounter Fuels Backlash Against Meta AI ‘Pervert Glasses’
Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
No expectation of privacy in public I’m afraid :( not legally anyway.
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Malyca@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
That’s actually so good to hear, as a mom
mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 22 hours ago
the thing we must remember is none of this tech is actually inevitable. the people who portray it that way, comparing it to different (pen cams, pocket cameras etc) aren’t being genuine about the capabilities this hardware boasts - high resolution recording wherever they look, with the potential for all kinds of ai trashware - facial recognition, grok undressing etc., - and it’s fuckin disgusting how many portray it as ‘oh well it’s gonna happen’.
No. Ostracize those who wear it, especially the ones disabling the recording lights.
Malyca@lemmy.zip 22 hours ago
I have no intention of doing otherwise
AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 hours ago
Maybe not in the US, but that’s not true on the rest of the planet.
Malyca@lemmy.zip 9 hours ago
Fair enough I need to realize this place isn’t as American as Reddit.