Comment on Person Hides Prompt Injection in Legal Filing Telling AI to Side With Them
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 weeks agoNot that I disagree with your point, but it would be closer to a student adding prompt injections to his work to change his grade. It only works if the person scoring is using AI, which they shouldn’t be doing, but it’s still cheating.
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
Closer still would be something simpler: the student hands in an essay with that white text footer, aiming for the possible grading algorithm. ☝🏼
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Thats what I meant, that was my example.
If it wasn’t cheating, then what makes the grade unfair? What about a case where the person notices it working and just silently accumulates fake grades. It’s definitely a form of cheating imo.
wyldrstallyns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
TBF, the cheating here is from such a court (or school) using “AI” to do what they’re appointed/paid to do. Who’s actually surprised, though? In a country where the legal system is a tool for the exploitive class, and “public school” is designed to output workers (not thinkers, etc.)… thafuq did we expect? Hoverboards?
Grimy@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
Ones a faulty system festering because of greed and laziness, the other is a attack on that system to get unjust results.
Two wrongs don’t make a right imo. I’d still classify it as cheating even though the opportunity is only there because of the systems unethical reliance on AI.