Comment on Trump administration sides with OpenAI in lawsuit against New York Times
adhocfungus@midwest.social 1 month agoI think the inconsistency is the point. It’ll be based on how much money you have. So individuals will always be in the wrong, companies can legally steal from artists, and megacorps can legally use whatever they like. But smaller corps can’t steal from megacorps, so AI models will always be safe.
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
That’s not how legal precedence works, and trying to force that dissonance on society always results in societal collapse
adhocfungus@midwest.social 1 month ago
I couldn’t agree more. The fact that it isn’t preventing selective enforcement of the law tells me we’re way past legal precedence being relevant (and well into societal collapse).
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
We’re already balls deep in societal collapse, our ruling class have no incentive not take everything they can get while there’s still anything worth taking
givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 month ago
I think you might to reply to comment above mine:
It obviously already is, and I assumed that they meant it will continue to progress down that path.
But you seemed to have missed all that…
Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml 1 month ago
No, I definitely meant to reply to you arguing that an inconsistent legal precedent would lead to societal collapse, and you definitely don’t know what you’re talking about