yeah sorry I dont want that
Comment on Bitwarden Switches to Commercial License
AzuraTheSpellkissed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
As always, people overreacting in the comments (of the linked forum). So the current plan is that the core remains OSS, but upcoming features are partially not. To me that sounds similar to Chrome’s or VSCode’s approach.
Mustachius_Grumpius@thelemmy.club 3 weeks ago
AzuraTheSpellkissed@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 weeks ago
I’m not saying that’s great news, but it doesn’t sound like the self destruction move that some OSS companies have done recently. I wouldn’t migrate away just because of that change. In the end, they have to find a sustainable mode of operation.
lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 weeks ago
They are going to slowly strip features from the free version over time.
4am@lemmy.zip 2 weeks ago
It’s 2026 and you have way too much optimism left after all the OSS rug pulls of the last six fucking years.
Even hardware rugpulled. Fucking Micron.
Forget it; BitWarden is cooked.
bertlewirth@lemmy.world 2 weeks ago
So the current plan is that the core remains OSS
… for now.
Enhance, Embrace, Extinguish.
1984@lemmy.today 2 weeks ago
It’s not overreacting when you have seen the same development at least 10 times before. Its called experience.
Dirk@lemmy.ml 2 weeks ago
So it’s open core now? As if this would be any better.
ture@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Be cautious in such cases is not overreacting. We’ve seen enough open to closed rug pulls in the last years.
freely1333@reddthat.com 2 weeks ago
Fucking minIO