Comment on Does anyone here have experience with Glauca.digital registrar?
user224@lemmy.sdf.org 1 week agoOK, now I am even more interested. dig doesn’t return an A record:
$ dig glauca.digital a ; <<>> DiG 9.20.27 <<>> glauca.digital a ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 11516 ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 1, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1232 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;glauca.digital. IN A ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: glauca.digital. 3600 IN SOA ns1.as207960.net. 2bd17d47fafc43aa9be298a1cdfbd0ee.dns.glauca.digital. 1791925047 86400 3600 86400 3600
Somehow, it does work in a browser. I tried different DNS servers as well (including NextDNS which I use in a browser), none returns an A record (or AAAA). So, naturally, I am curios what IP the browser uses. Since it clearly works, I tried ping just so that I could see the resulting IP, and figure out where it’s coming from.
$ ping glauca.digital ping: glauca.digital: No address associated with hostname
Great. That makes absolutely no sense at all. Where is Firefox getting the information from?
So I went to about:networking DNS tab. The address field is empty. I am just typing this as I test. It’s just cache in my browser.
I guess that would answer on reliability question. At least their nameservers still resolve to IP.