Comment on Your evil deeds may be causing Baldur's Gate 3 bugs

• Goronmon@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

  You didn’t say that, so I’m curious what you feel that measure would be.

  source

  • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    I did say “they did so many things right”, with which I was referring to this objective measure of quality. There is a good reason this game is so universally beloved, and there are good reasons why Starfield isn’t.

    source

    • Cybersteel@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

      Should supposed “good” games get a pass? Nay I say both bad and others game be put on the same weighing scale. The subjective “goodness” of a game shalt have no bearing on the sanctity of the product.

      source

      • FooBarrington@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

        Did somebody say “let’s ignore all problems good games have”?

        If a game is good, and bugs are getting fixed, why shouldn’t the bugs be viewed more leniently than a non-good game with bugs that are not getting fixed? Why must we view these things as equivalent, when they are different in multiple dimensions?

        source
  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world ⁨7⁩ ⁨months⁩ ago

    Personally, I don’t get frustrated so much by the presence of bugs themselves (though it can depend on their impact) as the longevity of some of them. A lot of the bugs were cute in Skyrim, but if you see the same or similar bug in the new game, it gets less cute.

    But there could be a part of it that comes from “familiarity breeds contempt”. BG3, while being a sequel to BG2, is new and fresh. Starfield feels like Skyrim in space. Bethesda has been a powerhouse for a long time, while Larian wasn’t as popular going in, so expectations are higher for Bethesda, too.

    Though I’ve gotta admit I haven’t played any BG3 and not much Starfield, so this is a bit speculative.

    source