Comment on US man used AI to generate 13,000 child sexual abuse pictures, FBI alleges
laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 5 months agoWe’re not disagreeing.
The question was:
“Is this an abuse image if it was generated?”
Yes, it is an abuse image.
Is it actual abuse? Of course not.
Daxtron2@startrek.website 5 months ago
And yet its being treated as though it is
laughterlaughter@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Well, that’s another story. I just answered your question. “Are these images about abuse even if they’re generated?” Yup, they are.
“Should people be prosecuted because of them?” Welp, someone with more expertise should answer this. Not me.
PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 5 months ago
Images of children being raped are being treated as images of children being raped. Nobody has every been caught with child pornography and charged as if they abused the children themselves. Everything is being treated as it always has been, but you’re here arguing that it’s moral and harmless as long as an AI does it, using every semantic trick and shifted goalpost you possibly can.