Rob has no “testimony”. Rob has questioned Bob’s statement without making any attempt to see things from Bob’s perspective or to ask Bob about his suffering. Rob, and by Rob I mean you, lack any empathy or curiosity that would open him to any possibility of understanding another person’s struggles.
Comment on Why can't I argue against claims of suffering?
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 10 months agoWell we do have Rob’s testimony. Which is certainly vastly superior to your judgment based on minimal information. The obvious thing to do would be to trust Rob. But you prefer the minimal information. Interesting.
anonymouse@lemmings.world 10 months ago
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 10 months ago
He observed Bob and made a relevant statement. That is literally testimony.
MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Again, my responses are based ENTIRELY on the information that you provided, so if I’m missing an important plot point that is your fault not mine.
I’m now realizing that the real issue that has started all this turmoil is that you are not anywhere near as smart as you seem to think you are.
It’s pretty clear that you didn’t actually come here to resolve anything or get any answers, but just to create some troll foolishness…
cameron_vale@lemm.ee 10 months ago
And I offerred you an actual witness. But you discard this perfectly good witness out of principal.
MrJameGumb@lemmy.world 10 months ago
Back under your bridge troll! I’ll waste no more time on your troll hijinks today!