Nobody can tell you, and if they say they do know, they’re selling snake oil.
But when it happens, shit is going to change fast, for better or for worse.
JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 day ago
How long until AGI and we don’t need separate models for every single thing?
Nobody can tell you, and if they say they do know, they’re selling snake oil.
But when it happens, shit is going to change fast, for better or for worse.
Potentially never
Tool use/mcp can do an awful lot already, not everything but it’s hard to come up with stuff it just plain can’t do.
Agi is poorly defined, without a clear definition of exactly what it is there will never be a time we actually achieve it because the goalposts will move.
We all probably remember the time that the turing test was the ultimate test of an ai, but that’s pretty well cooked and it no longer matters at all.
AGI has always had a same definition: general intelligence, when an AI can do anything a human brain could.
Don’t see how that’s not the case now. Only thing missing is a universal harness, which it’ll probably be able to build itself soon, for sure humans can’t.
A pretty long time.
Niche models are tons of fun though.
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 4 hours ago
I don’t know for sure, but right now we’re in a very early version of an AGI with limitations, but it’s only available to users who pay a subscription.