Comment on President Trump: It's Not Doable for AI Companies to Pay for All Copyrighted Input * TorrentFreak
bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
[deleted]
Comment on President Trump: It's Not Doable for AI Companies to Pay for All Copyrighted Input * TorrentFreak
bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
That would be even worse. No one who pushes for this has ever critically thought through the consequences of it. It’s laughably naive
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
Copyrights exists to maintain profits of large corporations. Copyright, patents, and intellectual rights were created under the false pretense that it “protects the little person”, but these are lies told by the rich and powerful to keep themselves rich and powerful. Time and time again, we have seen how broken the patent system is, how it is impossible to not step on musical copyright, how Disney has extended copyrights to forever, and how the megacorporations have way more money than everybody else to defend those copyrights and patents. These people are not your friend, and their legal protections are not for you.
So, fuck them. Let AI destroy the fabric of copyrights.
MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
In short, copyright should not exist because it is a state monopoly.
p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 months ago
State monopolies are fine. The government is owned by the people, and when corporations don’t think an industry is profitable, the government’s job is to step it and take on that job themselves. That’s how we end up with utilities, 911 services, the post office (back when it wasn’t fucked with by Republicans).
The problem with copyrights is the corporate stank that gatekeeps enforcement. When a large corporate entity sues a small party, the small party is fucked.
Also, Mark Twain and Disney fucked up the length of copyright over the last 150 years. The social agreement was that we were supposed to get most of this shit into public domain in a reasonable amount of time. 80 years + life of the author is not a fucking reasonable amount of time, by any stretch of the imagination.
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
This is the exact argument I was talking about.
Without copyright, those corporations can steal whatever they want from anyone. Whoever has the best distribution will profit the most.
If people cannot sustain themselves by making things things, people will stop making those things. That is bad for everyone.
Does our current system need a lot of work? Yes.
Is No-System-At-All a better option? Fuck no
bacon_pdp@lemmy.world 2 months ago
Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip 2 months ago
Am I supposed to recognize what that acronym refers to? Root Mean Square?
I doubt they’re different arguments than I’ve already seen a dozen times by idiots who only think one step through the consequences of their idea.
FatCrab@slrpnk.net 2 months ago
Richard Stallman, the creator of the GPL, a “copyleft” license. The problem is that Open Source Software is entirely reliant on a strong copyright system to be enforced. There is nothing else that prevents companies from just keeping everything proprietary, even if it’s all oss under the hood.