Comment on Microsoft admits it 'cannot guarantee' data sovereignty
ogmios@sh.itjust.works 1 day agoIt was just one example dude. The entire system we’ve built is so full of holes it’s basically impossible to safeguard data that ends up on a computer.
Hell, someone literally hacked and blew up an Iranian nuclear centrifuge which didn’t even have a connection.
Yeah?
This is what happens when system complexity grows unconstrained.
We may look at a piece of software and say, “right, this software is secure!”, but the clock has already started ticking toward the next vulnerability found.
This does not make the field of computing flawed, but rather the systems we run computing on is flawed.
the systems we run computing on is flawed
This is my point.
Whostosay@sh.itjust.works 1 day ago
No.