It’s harm reduction to vote for someone who just lets fascists implement their policies, anyways?
Comment on New Arizona law to restrict online porn access; Pornhub will block state
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 week agoVoting blue no matter who turned out to not be a good strategy.
It’s funny how you relabel harm-reduction in voting, and imply the alternative wouldn’t have been far worse. It’s an art.
ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 week ago
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Yes because they’re quieter and the white cis middle class liberals can all pretend everything’s okay. The gay ones too, until recently.
Harm reduced.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
How about that Keir Starmer?
hector@lemmy.today 1 week ago
The larger problem is that the Democrats are worthless and unpopular by design. So they are incapable of defeating the Republican. There is no alternate vision, they are playing defenseon what the Republicans do.
So while it might be better than the alternative, the alternative is inevitably going to happen because they suck.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Exactly! Alternate visions are not welcome in politics.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
A vote for a democrat is at best toilet paper.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Nothing makes me more hostile to the idea of voting blue than this fractally abusive rhetoric. If you’re a RNC operative, you are a very very good one.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Weird how none of the party backed whatshisname in new York. Please stop.