It doesn’t stop fascism, that’s for sure
Comment on New Arizona law to restrict online porn access; Pornhub will block state
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week agoYeah. Voting blue no matter who turned out to not be a good strategy.
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Voting blue no matter who turned out to not be a good strategy.
It’s funny how you relabel harm-reduction in voting, and imply the alternative wouldn’t have been far worse. It’s an art.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Weird how none of the party backed whatshisname in new York. Please stop.
ubergeek@lemmy.today 1 week ago
It’s harm reduction to vote for someone who just lets fascists implement their policies, anyways?
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Yes because they’re quieter and the white cis middle class liberals can all pretend everything’s okay. The gay ones too, until recently.
Harm reduced.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
How about that Keir Starmer?
hector@lemmy.today 1 week ago
The larger problem is that the Democrats are worthless and unpopular by design. So they are incapable of defeating the Republican. There is no alternate vision, they are playing defenseon what the Republicans do.
So while it might be better than the alternative, the alternative is inevitably going to happen because they suck.
tlekiteki@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 week ago
Exactly! Alternate visions are not welcome in politics.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
A vote for a democrat is at best toilet paper.
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
Nothing makes me more hostile to the idea of voting blue than this fractally abusive rhetoric. If you’re a RNC operative, you are a very very good one.
Psythik@lemmy.world 1 week ago
It would have worked if the tankies would have actually went out out and voted blue! But no, you rather vote for genocide and fascism by staying home.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Liberals suck so much. She was probably told the talking point “protect children” yada yada and just signed it hoping to score political points without any critical thought on how it’s the opposite.
She also signed an EO that lets people get covid shots without a perscription because the fed is run by people intent on destrying the country, so.
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 week ago
She is acting on behalf of lobbyists. That’s how America got to this stage. Lobbyist lawyers and marketers write laws that benefit them, and they “donate” to politicians to pass that legislation.
The only politicians who actually read anything they vote on are leftists like Bernie and AOC; everyone else is doing what their financiers tell them to do.
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 week ago
Lobbyists for what?
unconsciousvoidling@sh.itjust.works 1 week ago
Pocket pussies
WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Christian Nationalism
SapientLasagna@lemmy.ca 1 week ago
Big Blueballs™
fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 1 week ago
I wish someone would make a “protect children” bill that actually protects children
Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 1 week ago
But that would target all the people in power.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 week ago
And so we should need a prescription for a COVID shot? Am I misunderstanding you?
LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 week ago
No its just the contrast between nonsense and common sense.
RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 1 week ago
Ah, yes, agreed
primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 1 week ago
They’re craven and evil–not compulsively evil like red team.