no one wants to pay royalties to mpeg consortium
Comment on When a video codec wins an Emmy | The Mozilla Blog
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Hopefully they will fix the encode speed with AV2. You need a super computer to encode AV1 in a reasonable amount of time. H.265 is significantly faster for a similar quality.
ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 2 days ago
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 1 day ago
No, but I don’t want to wait a day or more for a movie to encode either.
ugjka@lemmy.ugjka.net 1 day ago
get a gpu that can encode av1
rafoix@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
Isn’t that orders of magnitude more expensive than paying a royalty?
BrikoX@lemmy.zip 2 days ago
It sucks on CPU, but for GPU encode even cheapest Intel Arc cards can chew through it with no problem.
GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 day ago
I mean, you generally decode an asset several magnitudes more often than encoding it, and decoding basically must happen real-time, while encoding can most often happen ahead-of-time. Having encodes be a bit on the slower side if it gains you higher compression is arguably worth it.
who@feddit.org 1 day ago
If you’re counting in terms of viewer hours, then sure. However, given the rise of Twitch-style live broadcasts, I think the picture would be noticeably different if you count programming hours instead.