UK likely to miss Paris climate targets by wide margin, analysis shows

Submitted ⁨⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago⁩ by ⁨GreyShuck@feddit.uk⁩ to ⁨unitedkingdom@feddit.uk⁩

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/05/uk-miss-paris-climate-targets-emissions

Exclusive: Under current policies, Britain could fall short of internationally agreed goal of 68% cut in emissions by 2030

What is Cop28 and why does it matter?

Fiona Harvey in Dubai Tue 5 Dec 2023 16.00 GMT Last modified on Tue 5 Dec 2023 16.57 GMT

The UK government is likely to miss its targets under the Paris climate agreement by a wide margin, analysis shows, dealing a devastating blow to Britain’s standing on the international stage.

Under current policies, the UK’s greenhouse gas emissions are likely to be 59% lower in 2030 than they were in 1990 – but the country’s internationally agreed target is for a 68% reduction by the end of this decade. The gap is likely to leave Britain in breach of these commitments.

The 2030 emissions goal was agreed at Cop26, the UN climate summit hosted by the UK in Glasgow in 2021, and has been reaffirmed at Cop28, taking place in Dubai this week.

source

Comments

Sort:hotnew top

Emperor@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
This is.not much of a surprise given all the nonsense with new oil and gas contracts as well as the constant chipping away at green policies.

What I don’t get is the lack of sense of urgency amongst the 0.1% - we all live in the same planet and their mountains of cash will only get them so far (this side of jumping on a rocket ship to somewhere an order of magnitude or two more hostile to life).

source
- thehatfox@lemmy.world ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
  Most of them probably think they will have died by the time the effects of climate change are great enough to bother them, or that their money will be enough to insulate themselves from it. There’s already plenty of Silicon Valley types fantasising about luxury doomsday bunkers.
  
  I think there’s a significant amount of hopelessness and futility in the corridors of power also. It is an enormous task to get the entire world to take coordinated and far reaching action on anything, and some don’t think it’s possible.
  
  source
  - Emperor@feddit.uk ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
    
    Most of them probably think they will have died by the time the effects of climate change are great enough to bother them
    
    But they have tend to have children and grandchildren.
    
    or that their money will be enough to insulate themselves from it.
    
    Yes, if there’s a cull, they’ll be on the right end of the scythe.
    
    I have a horrible suspicion that they’ve just drunk the Koolaid - if you only hang around with energy executives who are also denying climate change you either buy into the idea that there isn’t a problem or hand-wave it away by saying some boffin will solve the problem.
    
    It is an enormous task to get the entire world to take coordinated and far reaching action on anything, and some don’t think it’s possible.
    
    It may not be.
    
    Carbon capture and storage or geoengineering just look to be fig leaves that allow Big Carbon to keep rumbling on (why a lot of the argument at COP 28 was over “abatement”). Which feels very short-termist, if they redirected a fraction of the profits (or the money they spend lobbying against green legislation) into building things like solar energy farms across North Africa and the southern states in the US, they could create a future of near limitless profit for themselves. Unfortunately, while the dirty energy companies are fighting any change to their status quo, making any progress will be impossible.
    
    source
autotldr@lemmings.world [bot] ⁨1⁩ ⁨year⁩ ago
This is the best summary I could come up with:

The UK government is likely to miss its targets under the Paris climate agreement by a wide margin, analysis shows, dealing a devastating blow to Britain’s standing on the international stage.

Danny Gross, a campaigner at Friends of the Earth, said: “Despite the prime minister’s repeated assurances, the UK’s 2030 climate commitment is seriously off-track – and that gap has grown significantly under Rishi Sunak’s leadership.

“The fact remains that you can’t approve new fossil fuel projects, max out North Sea oil and gas and roll back vital green policies while staying committed to our climate targets – it’s one road or the other.”

For developed countries, these updates are expected to be a strengthening – a process agreed in Glasgow known as the “ratchet” under the Paris agreement – unless they are stricken by a natural or economic disaster.

And yet there’s still time to get things back on course with bold and ambitious leadership that recognises the scale and pace of change required,” he said.“That starts with a fully fledged climate action plan.

A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: “This report is inaccurate and ignores the fact we’ve overdelivered on every target to cut our emissions to date.

The original article contains 1,030 words, the summary contains 204 words. Saved 80%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

source