GLONASS?
FCC chair says we’re too dependent on GPS and wants to explore ‘alternatives’.
Submitted 2 days ago by Tea@programming.dev to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.fcc.gov/news-events/blog/2025/03/05/boosting-gps-and-911-usa
Comments
SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 days ago
cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 2 days ago
Probably E-LORAN. It’s ground based and transmits significantly more power than GPS. That makes it harder to jam, especially over a wide area.
SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 days ago
It’s a joke, since GLONASS is the Russian system. E-LORAN would be ironic, considering that the U.S. demolished its LORAN infrastructure around 2009. What are the odds that the best backup just happens to be Starlink?
xia@lemmy.sdf.org 2 days ago
I was going to comment on the +/-8m accuracy being a let-down, but apparently that’s the accuracy of GPS too.
aaron@infosec.pub 2 days ago
And what’s that? I haven’t looked into it but who wants to bet it is starlink?
And if it is, does America really want to rely on that lol?