Another chance for JPEG XL? PDF will support format as 'preferred solution'

Comments

• Sxan@piefed.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Another chance? I just realized a month ago every piece of software I use supports it, and started using it as my default.

  Next, I’m going to put browser detection on my web site and have a pop-up for Chrome, saying “This site works best in Firefox. Upgrade to a modern browser for the best experience.”

  source

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    Except Firefox doesn’t support JPEG XL and they are pretty hostile to it. Only Safari does out of box.

    • github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/…/522
    • github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/pull/1064

    source
  • e0qdk@reddthat.com ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    It doesn’t work in Firefox though… (unless you’re running Nightly, I think).

    source
• onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨6⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

  Is this the right format? I thought there was an alternative with better compression and it was opensource and without royalties.

  source

  • BrikoX@lemmy.zip ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

    AVIF and JPEG XL are two of the top of the line standards, but both have different strengths and weaknesses. Each of them are also being backed by a different monopoly power hence neither of them being implemented universally.

    source

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev ⁨5⁩ ⁨hours⁩ ago

      Once you mentioned AVIF, I found it “FLIF”, but JPEG-XL is an extension thereof.

      source
• Lojcs@piefed.social ⁨1⁩ ⁨day⁩ ago

  Thank you cto of pdf

  source