i believe that cooling in space is EVEN HARDER then cooling in atmosphere. something about a near vacuum being a terrible, terrible thermal conductor
Datacenters in space are a terrible, horrible, no good idea.
Submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@libretechni.ca to technology@lemmy.zip
https://taranis.ie/datacenters-in-space-are-a-terrible-horrible-no-good-idea/
Comments
WraithGear@lemmy.world 3 hours ago
the_q@lemmy.zip 1 day ago
I like how the absurdity scale just keeps going up when all we gotta do is kill like 400 people. Simple solutions.
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Billionaires won’t rest until they end life on Earth. A lot of these psychopaths believe in the big replacement. They are morons having no clue that they too will die.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
TBH the billionaires might survive along with other cockroaches. They’ll at least outlast the plebs above ground…
Fredselfish@lemmy.world 4 hours ago
Remember they have to hire people to build those, and we will find them and destroy them before life ends. Those fucks don’t get to live.
JayTreeman@fedia.io 23 hours ago
I haven't read the article, but know a little bit. This is a thing only a person that thinks space is magic would think is a good idea. The big reason is heat. More specifically how to get rid of it. Our more realistic and earthbound data centers primarily use electricity to power cooling. How do you get rid of the heat in space? There's nothing to transfer the heat to.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
This is a thing only a person that thinks space is magic would think is a good idea.
Pretty sure this is a primary basis of scientific “education”, worship of the moon/mars, etc.
It’s always been about extracting resources from rubes while actual humans suffer.
4am@lemmy.zip 22 hours ago
Also, power. MFers acting like we got dilithium crystals up in here. And yeah, we probably could do Star Trek style ships if we had a way to make power in space…but we don’t, like, at ALL
theneverfox@pawb.social 2 hours ago
Umm… We absolutely do, solar panels. Constant full exposure to the sun adds up quick, especially when they don’t even need structural support
There’s plenty of problems with this idea, but power is the one strong point
atrielienz@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Anyone else feel like they are only floating this idea so that data centers in neighborhoods driving up the cost of electricity and polluting everything looks better by comparison?
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
They don’t need their bullshit grift to look good. They’re going to build it anyway.
jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 day ago
Until someone has to go up to unplug it and plug it back in again. 😁
ceenote@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I propose we adopt the space data center idea, as long as the billionaire owner is the one who has to go maintain it.
They could just pull up on their bootstraps until they’re in orbit.
testfactor@lemmy.world 1 day ago
To clarify, the article is just saying that it’s wildly unfeasible and prohibitively expensive.
They’re not saying it’s dangerous or going to harm people in some way.
I feel like some people may get the wrong idea from the headline.
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
It’s absolutely harmful to waste resources on worthless grifting at the expense of the planet and people suffering from very real deprivation.
That’s why it’s the same people promoting both the grift and the deprivation.
testfactor@lemmy.world 1 hour ago
Sure, but that’s not what the article is saying, to be clear.
RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 23 hours ago
You mean they didn’t mention that the laws of physics make data transfer to and from orbit an absolute PitA and that no one would sit around for that long?
technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 hours ago
Yeah, but that’s the point. It’s a boondoggle. Grifters need a bottomless hole for marks to pour money down.