The fine includes £450,000 for lack of age checks to prevent children from seeing pornography.
4Chan responds to £520,000 Ofcom fine with AI picture of hamster
Submitted 20 hours ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to technology@lemmy.zip
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c624330lg1ko
Comments
Heinous@feddit.online 20 hours ago
Sunshine@piefed.ca 13 hours ago
Nice to see civil disobedience of such a stupid law.
I’m tired of hearing all this talk that “every single company will follow age verification.”
Blindly following orders is what leads off a cliff.
Omgboom@lemmy.zip 20 hours ago
Surprised it wasn’t a pepe
schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 13 hours ago
I hope the UK one day becomes a less anti-freedom country because I would really find it interesting to travel there, but things like this are killing my desire to do so.
John Perry Barlow got it right 30 years ago: www.eff.org/cyberspace-independence
Sunshine@piefed.ca 13 hours ago
The uk has banned books. Full of nanny state vibes.
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
Paywall.
sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 17 hours ago
Sites deploy these based on an uptick in views and where your IP is based. Set your VPN to Iceland, it’s not locked at time of writing. Try another location if it is.
hornedfiend@piefed.social 13 hours ago
9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 19 hours ago
I noticed 4chan is not doing age verification checks, even though they host pornographic content.
P00ptart@lemmy.world 16 hours ago
Kids always learn how to get around those checks. Even back in my day when there were very few sites that had checks, I quickly found my way around them, and for a millennial I’m considered barely computer litterate. I’m certainly no hacker by any means. I won’t even pirate shit, cause I don’t trust myself not to fuck something up. Like the whole ID thing? Id just grab dads ID if it doesn’t require a credit card.
Iconoclast@feddit.uk 11 hours ago
My parents’ porn VHS collection didn’t ask for my age and neither did my grand-dad’s titty magazines hidden in the tractor shed. Internet wasn’t even a thing for most people then yet I had already seen plenty of porn before I turned 10.
It clearly did affect me and I don’t deny that but I doubt it would’ve made much of a difference had I have to wait untill I was 18 for the flood gates to open. Nobody would’ve seen me for months if that was the case.
zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 hours ago
Companies – wherever they’re based – are not allowed to sell unsafe toys to children in the UK.
This sounds very much like
You wouldn’t download a car
lvxferre@mander.xyz 13 hours ago
Troll has a point.
Disregard for a moment it’s 4chan doing it. Once I do so, I feel like their approach to this matter is close to ideal: they’re highlighting that the entity in question is stepping over its legal boundaries, they’re taunting the lawyers trying to bully them into submission, and they’re ridiculing both the entity in charge of the bullying and the law being used to do so. A shitty law that we know to not be about protecting children, it’s using children as hostages to kill internet anonymity.
I wish more sites did the same.
[BTW there’s a similar law here in Brazil, the “lei Felca”. Equally ridiculous. But given this is Latin America, and law enforcement in LatAm is notoriously sloppy… so far it changed absolutely nothing for me.]