Funny, I have a pile of games that work just fine without a server. Multiplayer might be a truck bon-locally, but no reason it needs remote calls to work otherwise.
California bill pushing to keep games playable after server shutdowns "doesn't reflect how games actually work", ESA assert
Submitted 21 hours ago by GamingBot@lemmy.zip [bot] to gaming@lemmy.zip
Comments
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 20 hours ago
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 20 hours ago
They don’t work that way when you allow game companies to purposefully design their games to eventually break…?
vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 20 hours ago
This just in, the ESA has no idea how games work.
unmagical@lemmy.ml 19 hours ago
Yeah, that’s the point. You made them not work that way and the bill is to compel you to make them work that way.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 6 hours ago
Right? Or at least release the source code so others can. SKG is surprisingly reasonable in what they ask. They know you can’t run servers forever. So release a dedicated server client. Or peer to peer. Or just the source and the community will build a new one. We’ve had enough of the excuses.