Funny, I have a pile of games that work just fine without a server. Multiplayer might be a truck bon-locally, but no reason it needs remote calls to work otherwise.
California bill pushing to keep games playable after server shutdowns "doesn't reflect how games actually work", ESA assert
Submitted 3 weeks ago by GamingBot@lemmy.zip [bot] to gaming@lemmy.zip
Comments
ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 3 weeks ago
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 weeks ago
They don’t work that way when you allow game companies to purposefully design their games to eventually break…?
vagrancyand@sh.itjust.works 3 weeks ago
This just in, the ESA has no idea how games work.
unmagical@lemmy.ml 3 weeks ago
Yeah, that’s the point. You made them not work that way and the bill is to compel you to make them work that way.
scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 3 weeks ago
Right? Or at least release the source code so others can. SKG is surprisingly reasonable in what they ask. They know you can’t run servers forever. So release a dedicated server client. Or peer to peer. Or just the source and the community will build a new one. We’ve had enough of the excuses.