hotdogcharmer
@hotdogcharmer@lemmy.zip
- Comment on 'Godfather of AI' says tech giants can't profit from their astronomical investments unless human labor is replaced 6 days ago:
What does (free AI download) mean? I don’t think LLMs and the sort of “worker-replacing” AI tools being pushed everywhere are beneficial to anybody
- Comment on Here’s what ads on your $2,000 Samsung smart fridge will look like 1 week ago:
I do not, and will never, own a $2,000 Samsung smart fridge. Anybody who intentionally buys one of these things has an iffy brain. You do not need the tiktok fridge. It is okay to not be drowning in digital sounds and images for a scant few minutes of your day. Spend thirty seconds alone with your thoughts while you fetch a yoghurt from the fridge. You do not need an internet fridge. It will not keep your carrots any colder.
- Comment on Study proves being rude to AI chatbots gets better results than being nice 2 weeks ago:
Yeah I know it’s my opinion, that’ll be why I said “I feel” and “I think”.
Not gonna read about how you use your bs chatbot, I don’t care 🤷♂️
- Comment on Study proves being rude to AI chatbots gets better results than being nice 3 weeks ago:
I don’t want to use LLMs. I feel the majority of use cases for LLMs are inauthentic, lazy, unhelpful, and uncreative.
I understand that dbzero is a pro-AI instance, so I think we’re just fundamentally not going to agree on this. 🤷♂️
- Comment on Study proves being rude to AI chatbots gets better results than being nice 3 weeks ago:
I’m saying don’t use unethical tech. If you want to interpret that as sticking your head in the sand, you can, but I think you’re being obtuse.
Unless you’re advocating that we go and burn down the infrastructure that runs these LLMs - is that what you’re saying?
- Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors 3 weeks ago:
I don’t know why backing down after massive backlash is being lauded if I’m being completely honest. I want to replace them because the decision in the first place to pollute Wikipedia at all with AI is so poor that I no longer trust them to make good choices.
- Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors 3 weeks ago:
I get that I’m being pigheaded, but unfortunately I don’t trust that it was done out of some purely good intention and naivety. Even if that was the case, then the people making that decision are gullible enough to fall for LLM hype and too irresponsible to be in charge of something that we both agree is an absolute marvel of our modern age, and a massive collaborative effort contributed to by so many hundreds of thousands of people, and used by so many millions more.
I totally understand that I’m being stubborn, but this isn’t a principle I’m willing to compromise on in this case!
- Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors 3 weeks ago:
Honestly, I don’t know. I stopped listening after they said they were going to.
Too little too late for me really; unless they replace the people who made that decision in the first place, that sort of anti-human, lazy, irresponsible sentiment will remain present in their leadership.
- Comment on Wikipedia Says AI Is Causing a Dangerous Decline in Human Visitors 3 weeks ago:
I cancelled my donations to wikipedia since the WMF announced they’d be using AI, and they gave me a really milquetoast bullshit response when I emailed them. Can’t trust such a precious, collaborative, Human effort as Wikipedia to a bunch of anti-human robofuckers. 🤷♂️
- Comment on Study proves being rude to AI chatbots gets better results than being nice 3 weeks ago:
Do not engage with chatbots at all. Let this LLM psychosis end. That’s the best result for humanity.