Tiresia
@Tiresia@slrpnk.net
- Comment on GitHub Outages Since Microslop Acquisition 10 hours ago:
The difference between 97.1% uptime and 97.2% uptime is far less important than the difference between 99.98% uptime and 99.99% uptime, even though this graph shows the former as 10 times larger.
You are right to complain that a graph that exaggerates uptime differences on the scale of 10%, i.e. showing the full linear range from 0% to 100%, would be useless. But by the same token, a graph that exaggerates uptime differences on the scale of 1%, i.e. the OOP, is also useless. That we happen to live in a world where github’s uptime is varying at the scale of 1% doesn’t make the scale any more useful.
In this case, the graph of
-log(1-uptime)would get you the “number of nines”, which is commonly used because it’s more insightful and more indicative of actual quality. Better still would belog(uptime(t)/(1-uptime(t)), which is functionally the same above two “nines”, but also allows the plotting of low uptime services, such as individual seeders for torrents or specific nodes of a mesh, on the negative part of the scale. - Comment on 60% of PC gamers have no plans to build a new PC in the next two years — AI pricing crunch on RAM and other components paralyze enthusiast market 2 weeks ago:
To be fair, a lot of that 40% could be people whose first step of building a new PC is checking if it’s worth it, meaning they may well decide not to build one.
- Comment on Microsoft’s Edge Copilot update uses AI to pull information from across your tabs 2 weeks ago:
You guys are using Windows?
- Comment on Anthropic’s bug-hunting Mythos was greatest marketing stunt ever, says cURL creator 2 weeks ago:
The quotes seem to be strawmanning Anthropic’s report. AFAIK Anthropic’s claim was that it could find bugs and make exploits at a similar level to an expert, except as an LLM and thus more easily deployed at scale.
Most experts spend most of their time not reinventing the wheel.
But I guess people are now literally doing the I, Robot meme.
- Comment on Why are AGI and conscious AI just a marketing scam? 3 weeks ago:
Ah yes, you’re talking about an unprovable and unobservable thing that makes no testable predictions and doesn’t demonstrably correlate with any sort of behavior at all. That’s a very productive thing to talk about, I’m sorry for intruding.
- Comment on Why are AGI and conscious AI just a marketing scam? 3 weeks ago:
If consciousness can only be observed subjectively, why do people sometimes say someone is unconscious?
Nothing can ever be proven (even math proofs assume you aren’t hallucinating about having seen a convincing proof), but that usually isn’t the standard of evidence.
LLMs seem to meet most standards of consciousness formulated before GPT-2 released. They’re dumb in predictable ways, but so are human babies and horses and chickens and bees.