I do cringe just a tad at “We don’t partner based on individuals’ or organizations’ beliefs, values, or political stances outside of their alignment with us on increasing the adoption of open source software.” Mentioned here, but they do appear to do some research:
On Hyprland specifically, we were aware that there was past toxicity and controversy in their community, so we did research into it before deciding if we could sponsor the project. What we found was that there were past failures in moderation early in the creation of the project that had resulted in a toxic community, that the project lead vaxry had overhauled moderation years ago as a result, and that the community as it currently stands does not represent the one in which the issues occurred.
Though I cannot attest as to whether this clears anything/everything.
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 day ago
Railsworld sponsorship, which is still massively outsizing most other support. What I don’t see is any more of the constant posts about Omarchy, which is a net improvemen but still not at the spot I personally want to see.
tb_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I understand that it’s about the Rails World 2025 donation, but where do you see they’re still supporting Rails?
curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 1 day ago
Its in the list in the 2026 blog post. Since there are no dates in the columns, to me that shows as “this year’s list of assigned donations”.
Because:
tb_@lemmy.world 1 day ago
I agree the post is unclear, but I’m not sure where you get your assumption of it being “this year’s list”. That is reading something in the text which isn’t there. Furthermore;
That does not show continued support in and of itself.