Is it your position that cheaters are inevitable and publishers should not do anything to prevent them from cheating?
Comment on Battlefield V now broken on Steam Deck / Linux with EA anticheat live
mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
[deleted]
helenslunch@feddit.nl 8 months ago
Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
My position is that community moderated servers are significantly more effective at controlling cheaters than any intrusive anti-cheat has ever been, and that the rise in intrusive anti-cheat coinciding with the death of community and self hosted servers is not a coincidence.
supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 8 months ago
My position is that cheaters, spammers and griefers when they are relatively equally distributed in all popular competitive games are not actually a threat to the business model of massive corporations like EA, rather they are actually a great business opportunity to rationalize taking more and more control away from customers so long as they are loosely managed from getting entirely out of control.
helenslunch@feddit.nl 8 months ago
When cheating is happening across most competitive multiplayer games what does it really matter to EA?
I mean, other than making people not want to buy/play their games?
Bartsbigbugbag@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
Beauty of a position you have there.
Corngood@lemmy.ml 8 months ago
I agree. I think it’s the actual sense of community that you need. It’s the reason I can play rec sports or the pub quiz and it’s not constantly ruined by assholes.
You can’t have a sense of community with hundreds of thousands of people in the same queue to play a game.
Bruhh@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Description says it was recorded February 7
_Sprite@lemmy.world 8 months ago
Shitass support main. Hipfires with LMG mid-range, prones in the middle of the street, drops no ammo kits, somehow managed to die 3 times in the end.