Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages

• finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

  Right but to detect close-enough spellings and word orders, using a curated index or catalogue of accepted examples, is one thing.

  To train layers of algorithms in layers of machines on massive datasets to come up with close enoughs would be that but many times over the costs.

  You would be a moron to use llms for spellchecking.

  To clarify to you, not all programs are equal. Its not all different methods to do the same thing at the same cost.

  source

  • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

    A tool is a tool dude. Why are you trying to justify one over the other?

    source

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

      Ok but why the fuck do you think it’s okay to use a wrecking ball for a task that requires a chisel? You’re creating low quality high cost work just because it’s fast and easy.

      source

      • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world ⁨3⁩ ⁨days⁩ ago

        Why do you think grammarly is a thing dude…?

        People ALREADY use an llm for spellcheck, and it’s acceptable, yet this crosses a line…?

        It’s always funny what people will find acceptable, but also balk at when it’s fundamentally the exact same thing.

        Of these devs want to claim “no ai” and everything is human, than they can’t rely on spellcheck either. Both are automated tools no?

        source

        • -> View More Comments