Comment on Indie devs have begun adding a no generative AI stamp to their store pages
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 days agoGrammarly predates commercial generative AI, as I attempted to explain to you before. It’s over a decade old. You clearly don’t understand the core mechanisms of any of these things.
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 days ago
You seem to be missing the point that’s been made here since your ignorance is “ai bad”.
A tools a tool, any tool can be abused. So it’s a very hypocrital view to say these tools are acceptable, but make up arbitrary reasons why those ones aren’t. That’s what’s being done here, and why people are trying to shift the conversation focus to the “tool itself”.
Since even photoshop, grammarly, or any other non-ai tool is labour a usable too.
If we want humans doing stuff, why is a brushing tool acceptable? It’s not a human doing the work. So yeah the views here are extremely hypocritical.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 days ago
bro just doesn’t get it, sorry you’re slow mate
SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 3 days ago
Says the hypocrite that says one tool that replaces humans is okay, but not another.
Okay buddy, just because you can’t make a coherent argument or come up with a legitimate reason why one’s acceptable doesn’t make me slow. If anything just shows how flawed and fucked your reasoning is.
People have always used tools to replace humans. So this decry NOW over ai is what’s bullshit. They shouldn’t enable to use PS brush tools either. Same process, same outcome, the ai can actually be able to do more and remove labor. But now “that’s” not okay. This is what me and other users are pointing out.
But your “ai bad” bias, has made you ignorant to any actual discussions.
finitebanjo@lemmy.world 3 days ago
You’re not even arguing at this point, you’re just repeating false claims I already debunked as if saying things louder might make you more correct.